Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Jon TURNEY wrote: >> The xming patches aren't in an ideal format to work with, as they are split >> up >> by file and tend to have changes mixed together (I guess they are in >> chronological rather than thematic order or something) >> >> Anyhow, here's my current patch stack using xming derived stuff: >> >> http://www.dronecode.org.uk/cygwin/from-xming-patch-set-20081024.tar.bz2 >> >> Note the series file. :-) > > Thanks, I'll have to take a look at that.
Perhaps you better hold off on that, given what you say below. >> I've exchanged email with the Xming maintainer and he says it's ok to treat >> these patches as MIT/X11 licensed, even though they are CC licensed on the >> website. > > Really? Because I just got a message from him via sourceforge accusing > me of "published some of the Xming patches without retaining [his] > copyright". Well, that's his prerogative. Perhaps you can forward me the mail off-list and I can ask him what he wants me to do. For the record, there is no Xming derived material in any of the patches I've sent you so far, up until the "from-xming-patch-set" above. I purposefully didn't upload that until after I had his response. So there is no Xming derived material in the cygports xserver currently as far as I can tell. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Cygwin-ports-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cygwin-ports-general
