----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Plowman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The Windows 2000 has only 1 network interface and "route print" > mentions therefore 2 interfaces, the Ethernet interface and the > loopback interface. > > My Wife's Win 95 box also only has 1 network interface, but is not > accessable here so I can't do the same "route print" to see what the > system thinks. I will try tonight. > > Any further thoughts welcome... Does the 95 machine have DUN installed? IIRC 95 does something funny with broadcast traffic only going to the "first" adapter, which is defined by MAC address sort order, and DUN has (one of) a very high or very low address... Just a thought. Rob
- Re: cygwin-xfree: xdmcp: "no valid address" Alexander Gottwald
- Re: cygwin-xfree: xdmcp: "no valid address&qu... Mark Plowman
- Re: cygwin-xfree: xdmcp: "no valid address&qu... Robert Collins
- Re: cygwin-xfree: xdmcp: "no valid address&qu... Mark Plowman
- Re: cygwin-xfree: xdmcp: "no valid address&qu... Alexander Gottwald
- Re: cygwin-xfree: xdmcp: "no valid addres... Mark Plowman
- Re: cygwin-xfree: xdmcp: "no valid address&qu... Mark Plowman
- Re: cygwin-xfree: xdmcp: "no valid address&qu... Alexander Gottwald
- RE: cygwin-xfree: xdmcp: "no valid addres... Harold Hunt
- Re: cygwin-xfree: xdmcp: "no valid address&qu... Alexander Gottwald
- Re: cygwin-xfree: xdmcp: "no valid addres... Alexander Gottwald
- Re: cygwin-xfree: xdmcp: "no valid address&qu... Fabio Fabbri
- Re: cygwin-xfree: xdmcp: "no valid address&qu... Rasjid
