> -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 1:43 PM > >I saw a note back in December > >(http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-12/msg00950.html) > >that touched on this, but I couldn't find any followup. Did this > >wither on the vine? > > No. It's actually part of the current setup.exe. A minor errata: The HEAD cvs tag has it. The current setup.exe just silently ignores the data from the ini file. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- PGP signatures for packages? Michael Young
- Re: PGP signatures for packages? Christopher Faylor
- Re: PGP signatures for packages? Charles Wilson
- Re: PGP signatures for packages? Michael Young
- RE: PGP signatures for packages? Robert Collins
- RE: PGP signatures for packages? Robert Collins
- Re: PGP signatures for packages? Cliff Hones
- Re: PGP signatures for packages? Charles Wilson
- Re: PGP signatures for packages? Michael Young
- RE: PGP signatures for packages? Robert Collins
- RE: PGP signatures for packages? Robert Collins
- Re: PGP signatures for packages? Michael Young
- Re: PGP signatures for packages? Charles Wilson
- Re: PGP signatures for packages? Lapo Luchini
- RE: PGP signatures for packages? Robert Collins