"Michael Kairys" <kai...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > (3) http://www.f-prot.com
> 
> Thanks for the suggestion... Seems some reviews give them low marks on 
> detection rates:
> http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/RAP/RAP-quadrant-Feb-Aug09.jpg
> http://www.virus-centre.com/
> 
> ... and some low marks on features (19 out of 20):
> http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/index2.html

Very interesting, thank you! 
I can well live with the limited features, but if the low detection rate
comes true it would indeed worry me.

I also had a look into
http://www.av-comparatives.org/
but unfortunately they did not test f-prot.
 
Regards

--
Wilfried Hennings


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Reply via email to