On 10/27/2009 01:18 AM, Mark J. Reed wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
It is not gratuitous. 'ash' is now 'dash' instead of 'bash'. Dash is a
more standards compliant shell which is also faster.
Huh? ash was never bash, and ash.exe was part of the dash package last
I checked, so I'm confused by the above statement.
Yes, poor wording on my part. I meant 'sh', which I suppose isn't particularly
interesting in this thread. In any case, my point to the OP is that the change
of 'ash' coming from the 'dash' package was intentional and for a good reason
(i.e. to provide a better 'ash' than we've had in the past).
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
_____________________________________________________________________
A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple