> 2010/4/28, Lee D. Rothstein <l1ee057 at XXXXXXXXXXXX>: >FWIW, the man page says makeself, not makeself.sh.
Fair enough.
Two options, then:
-patching the manpage
-patching the source and the cygport
None of them involve too much work. So now I would like to know (from
some authoritative source :)) if a there is a guideline, an unspoken agreement,
or a good practice defined regarding the extension of non-binary executables
under /usr/bin.
Otherwise, I understand it is left to my choice.
Regards.
--
Huella de clave primaria: 0FDA C36F F110 54F4 D42B D0EB 617D 396C 448B 31EB
pgpBLf67tPXGD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
