On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:39, Gary <> wrote: > Christopher Faylor writes: >> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:18:28AM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: >>>So my questions remain. Christopher and Corinna, if you don't think a >>>redesign is a good idea, then please tell us that. >> >> Since you keep insisting, I'll do my usual WJM dance. Then everyone can >> disagree, recycle all of the same arguments, and demand another response. >> >> So far, I have not really cared for either of the proposed redesigns. > > IMO that's a perfectly okay answer, even if it isn't perhaps what some > people hoped for.
Yep. One isn't required to like everything (or even anything) that is put forward. >> I sincerely hate these discussions about what's "best" about something >> visual because it always devolves to self-proclaimed experts voicing >> their opinions and when it comes to subjective things like web-site >> layout everyone can be an expert. > > Actually there are objective things as well, based on psychological and > physiological (and yes, even technical) principles. > >> The bottom line for me is that I want >> something that I can maintain To my mind this leaves one unanswered question. Does this discussion and Chris' response serve as the starting point for requirements gathering, or is this a flat out dead topic? Steven -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple