On Oct 23 19:36, scow...@ckhb.org wrote: > > this new release of rebaseall has an error at lines 217 and 219. > the version i just downloaded erroneously assumes invocation of the > utility from the current directory. if i missed any previous > mention of this in the list, i apologize for the duplication. > > and thanks to Marco Atzeri for the rebase.db workaround. > > > *** rebaseall-err Sun Oct 23 19:22:14 2011 > --- rebaseall-fix Sun Oct 23 19:22:40 2011 > > *************** > *** 214,222 **** > > if [ -z "${BaseAddress}" ] > then > ! ./rebase "${Verbose}" -s "${Mach}" -T "${TmpFile}" > else > ! ./rebase "${Verbose}" -s "${Mach}" -b "${BaseAddress}" -o "${Offset}" > -T "${TmpFile}" > fi > ExitCode=$? > > --- 214,222 ---- > > if [ -z "${BaseAddress}" ] > then > ! rebase "${Verbose}" -s "${Mach}" -T "${TmpFile}" > else > ! rebase "${Verbose}" -s "${Mach}" -b "${BaseAddress}" -o "${Offset}" > -T "${TmpFile}" > fi > ExitCode=$?
Ouch, that's probably a residue of my testing. Fixed in CVS. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple