It's bad etiquette to derail an email thread with unrelated questions. On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 07:22:29PM +0100, Nick Lowe wrote: >Is there a reason why the Cygwin executables, and certainly the >installer, are not digitally signed by Redhat?
setup.exe is not produced by Red Hat and the Cygwin project at cygwin.com is not a Red Hat project. So, the logicstics of doing this aside, I doubt that Red Hat would be too keen on the idea. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple