On Dec 9 13:34, Frank Fesevur wrote: > 2013/12/9 Björn Kautler: > > I don't have a problem with being mean. > > Everyone makes mistakes. > > I just wonder that it gets broken silently without obvious (to me) reason > > and a question regarding it and with two proposed solutions just stays > > ignored while it would be very easy to fix. > > To me, the best way to fix these problems is simple: start using > alternatives again just like before vim-7.3.943-1. It makes everybody > happy. You don't need to know if just vim-minimal or the full vim is > installed. And whether you are used to typing "vi" or "vim", both > commands start the best available version of vim. > > I don't understand why it was removed anyway. I brought up the > question before and never got an answer.
The new vim layout closely reflects the Fedora packaging. It has a minimal vi in the vim-minimal package and a full-featured vim in the vim-enhanced package. I'm using a vi -> vim alias on Fedora for ages. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgpbCqEXfLGDq.pgp
Description: PGP signature