Ok, so you are telling me that it is "nothing" if a small - probably unintended - change breaks the whole vim functionality? o_O Especially if there is a fix as small as the erroneous change? C'mon, you're kidding me, aren't you?
Whatever, I'll NOT continue on this topic. I have a working workaround. I reported the problem to you guys. I just wanted to make sure my messages got through as everyone ignored it and didn't dare to answer even after I provided a patch. So do whatever you like with my report and proposed patch. I have more important things to do than fighting windmills. Cheerio Björn 2013/12/9 Christopher Faylor: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 04:40:19PM +0100, Bj?rn Kautler wrote: >>If you mean. "Let's focus on the small bug Bj?rn reported instead of >>talking about vi vs. vim", I'm absolutely on your side Christopher. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Much_Ado_About_Nothing > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple