Corinna Vinschen writes: > How? Details? Stackdump? It works for me(TM). The timing only shows > that it's not the right thing for you, or that in the long run the > non-caching option should just go away. For the time being, though, I > need *details*.
Sorry, that's the best I can do at the moment. > Hang on. Are you telling me this snapshot takes longer than the > snapshot from yesterday? And you're telling me that normal caching, as > was the default all the time, is slower in startup than with the > additional caching of groups at startup? Is your startup procedure > calling `id' twice by any chance? I've been using the network via VPN, and measured the numbers with the previous DLL(s) before testing the snapshot, results are in a different reply. > The problem with your numbers is that I have nothing really to compare > it with. It would be helpful to know what you're doing, the essential > parts of your startup for instance. I'm on my way to catch a plane, sorry this will be in about a week. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Wavetables for the Terratec KOMPLEXER: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#KomplexerWaves -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
