Corinna Vinschen writes:
> How?  Details?  Stackdump?  It works for me(TM).  The timing only shows
> that it's not the right thing for you, or that in the long run the
> non-caching option should just go away.  For the time being, though, I
> need *details*.

Sorry, that's the best I can do at the moment.

> Hang on.  Are you telling me this snapshot takes longer than the
> snapshot from yesterday?  And you're telling me that normal caching, as
> was the default all the time, is slower in startup than with the
> additional caching of groups at startup?  Is your startup procedure
> calling `id' twice by any chance?

I've been using the network via VPN, and measured the numbers with the
previous DLL(s) before testing the snapshot, results are in a different
reply.

> The problem with your numbers is that I have nothing really to compare
> it with.  It would be helpful to know what you're doing, the essential
> parts of your startup for instance.

I'm on my way to catch a plane, sorry this will be in about a week.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Wavetables for the Terratec KOMPLEXER:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#KomplexerWaves

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Reply via email to