On Mar 4 00:44, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! > > >> I'd need to test it in domain environment, > > And with sane number of groups (less than 20), the results are barely > different between different caching strategies (less than 1%, which could > easily be explained by measurement error), except (again) for the case of > runing `id' under "db_cache: no", which takes approximately twice as long, as > any other way. > > If you ask me, the choice is between "db_cahce: yes" and "db_cache: full", and > I don't have solid reason to prefer one over another. Not running with remote > connection to the domain here...
Ok, thanks. I guess I'll remove the "db_cache: no" option at one point. It just doesn't seem to make sense. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgpu7MiyCPbfw.pgp
Description: PGP signature