Greetings, cyg Simple! > On 8/21/2018 4:13 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: >> Greetings, cyg Simple! >> >>> During the testing at least one of the tests does `setfacl -m group:0:1 >>> tmpfile0`. Obviously this gets a 'permission denied' error as group 0 >>> doesn't exist. What do you suggest for reasonable replacement for 0? >> >> Nothing. Not all systems have a concept of "group 0". Just skip this test.
> I'm not interested in skipping the test; after all the path for the test > is Cygwin specific. Then contact the author of these tests and find out what they were thinking creating them. > It's just not the correct thing to do for the Cygwin specific path. That's exactly what I said. This is just not the right thing to test under Cygwin. > I believe 11 to be the correct test and will pursue that upstream. I strongly suggest learning the original intent of the test, before any "pursuit". > Marco suggested maybe 544(Administrator) but that doesn't work with a > typical user build while doing the same in Linux for root group 0 as a > typical user I would need to have elevated privilege in Windows to use 544. -- With best regards, Andrey Repin Wednesday, August 22, 2018 11:59:44 Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple