On Jan 29 16:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jan 29 22:46, Takashi Yano wrote: > > --- m4/fseeko.m4.orig 2020-01-29 21:39:37.280507900 +0900 > > +++ m4/fseeko.m4 2020-01-29 21:36:29.263747100 +0900 > > @@ -30,16 +30,19 @@ > > HAVE_FSEEKO=0 > > else > > if test $WINDOWS_64_BIT_OFF_T = 1; then
This makes me a bit suspicious... it looks like a check only required for native builds, not for Cygwin. > > - REPLACE_FSEEKO=1 > > + dnl REPLACE_FSEEKO=1 > > + REPLACE_FSEEKO=0 > > fi > > if test $gl_cv_var_stdin_large_offset = no; then > > - REPLACE_FSEEKO=1 > > + dnl REPLACE_FSEEKO=1 > > + REPLACE_FSEEKO=0 > > fi > > m4_ifdef([gl_FUNC_FFLUSH_STDIN], [ > > gl_FUNC_FFLUSH_STDIN > > case "$gl_cv_func_fflush_stdin" in > > *yes) ;; > > - *) REPLACE_FSEEKO=1 ;; > > + dnl *) REPLACE_FSEEKO=1 ;; > > + *) REPLACE_FSEEKO=0 ;; > > esac > > Commit 59362c80e3a in newlib you mention in your other mail should be a > minor change and the code looks pretty much the same in FreeBSD, while > OpenBSD and NetBSD are more similar to the old newlib code. Both > implementations should be ok, in theory. > > So, the question is, what exactly is this test testing? Can it be > extracted from the autoconf stuff and converted to a simple testcase > which proves that the behaviour is now wrong? > > If so, I'll revert commit 59362c80e3a. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
