Michael Wild via Cygwin writes: > Sorry for the mistake with the release number. Should that be a sanity > check in calm?
I personally don't think so, if you want to do a test / pre-release then starting with a "0" seems netural to me. > As for the problem with the control mode: Is there anything I can do? Since it's clearly a regression (on cygwin), it would be a start to check if any new warnings have popped up during compilation. > Like forwarding the problem to upstream? Or do you consider it to be > "unfixable" until Cygwin implements the control mode properly? I don't know, I haven't looked beyond the fact that tmux -C new doesn't give you any of the expected output and indefinitely hangs (although it seems to process at least some commands that you enter). I still hope it might just be a misguided #ifdef targeting Cygwin or some simarly silly mistake. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf rackAttack: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
