On 25.08.21 19:52, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
A couple years ago I had an idea for changing the pipe implementation to avoid
overlapped I/O:
https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2019q2/009393.html
https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2019q2/009423.html
I never followed up on it. But if you think it might help with this problem, I
could dust it off and try to finish it.
This sounds quite interesting! Do I assume correctly that these
changes may likely lead to a general improvement also in other
situations if the impact of the pipe is so big for this specific
case? Pipes are most likely used in quite a lot of scenarios?!
All the best,
Mario Emmenlauer
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
