On 2021-10-27 14:36, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote:
Oops, forgot to send to list.

On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Takashi Yano wrote:

On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 22:55:01 +0200
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
We're also planning to drop Support for the 32 bit release of Cygwin in
2022, thus Cygwin 3.4.0 won't come in 32 bit anymore, and the package
maintainers won't have to update 32 bit packages anymore.  If you're
still running Cygwin under WOW64, consider to move to 64 bit in the next
couple of months.

I agree with you that 32 bit cygwin under WOW64 is not worth to
support any more. However, 32 bit version of Windows 10 will be
still supported at least until Oct. 2025. Personally, I think it
would not be nice to exclude the supported windows version from
cygwin support.

Please also note that Windows on ARM64 only just got the ability to run
x86_64 binaries in Windows 11.  Previously the only option was 32-bit
x86, as there is no native ARM port of Cygwin.  I don't know about Cygwin
directly, but I know there are users of Git for Windows on ARM.

I think a more gradual sunsetting of 32-bit might be a resonable
compromise, based on the original wording:

11:26 <corinna> starting with 3.4.0, maintainers are not obliged to
release packages in 32 bit

so as of 3.4.0 some packages that are problematic on 32 bit may stop
providing 32-bit versions.  But not being obliged to release packages is a
whole different thing than having the core code that allows *any* package
to run being ripped out in that version.

I would expect the first action would be to eventually remove unsupported OS releases from the compatibility list in the Windows default manifest built into every Cygwin exe resources by gcc from package windows-default-manifest /usr/lib/default-manifest.o:
...
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<assembly xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1" manifestVersion="1.0">
  <trustInfo xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v3">
    <security>
      <requestedPrivileges>
        <requestedExecutionLevel level="asInvoker"/>
      </requestedPrivileges>
    </security>
  </trustInfo>
  <compatibility xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:compatibility.v1">
    <application>
      <!--The ID below indicates application support for Windows Vista -->
      <supportedOS Id="{e2011457-1546-43c5-a5fe-008deee3d3f0}"/>
      <!--The ID below indicates application support for Windows 7 -->
      <supportedOS Id="{35138b9a-5d96-4fbd-8e2d-a2440225f93a}"/>
      <!--The ID below indicates application support for Windows 8 -->
      <supportedOS Id="{4a2f28e3-53b9-4441-ba9c-d69d4a4a6e38}"/>
      <!--The ID below indicates application support for Windows 8.1 -->
      <supportedOS Id="{1f676c76-80e1-4239-95bb-83d0f6d0da78}"/>
      <!--The ID below indicates application support for Windows 10 -->
      <supportedOS Id="{8e0f7a12-bfb3-4fe8-b9a5-48fd50a15a9a}"/>
    </application>
  </compatibility>
</assembly>
...

But I think you may be able to override this in File Explorer ...exe Properties Compatibility tab.

--
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
[Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]

--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Reply via email to