On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 23:09:27 +0000 "Lavrentiev, Anton \(NIH/NLM/NCBI\) \[C\] wrote: > > Try using a more recent gdb. I just tried your test case with gdb-12.1-1 > > (available as a test release), and it seemed to work. > > Thanks for the quick response... Though I'd rather not use test releases.
The latest version of gdb that is not a test version is 11.2. But you are using 9.2. > The dumper binary and gdb in my case are supposed to be consistent with each > other > (installed from the set of release packages on the same day via setup)... So > I don't > really understand the discrepancy here: are you saying that dumper can > produce a core > that current gdb cannot read? But that's bizarre! Even if so, the combination of latest dumper.exe (in cygwin 3.3.5 package) and gdb 11.2 do not have such a problem. Therefore, we have nothing to do for that. -- Takashi Yano <takashi.y...@nifty.ne.jp> -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
