Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 08:59:35PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote: >> Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> I don't think it is that simple. Cygwin doesn't use the getopt that >>> comes with newlib. >> >> Ah. Just because I'm curious, why? >> >>> Is there supposed to be any correspondence between >>> the getopt version and the getsubopt version? >> >> I've just looked at newlib's getsubopt.c. It is completely >> independent of getopt, and in fact, has only been in newlib since >> 1.11.0. >> So, unless I've overlooked something, it *is* just a matter of >> cygwin.din/version.h. > > Ok, then. Thanks for checking. Getting ready to gratefully accept a > patch.
Just got round to looking at doing this. It uses a variable in the library, extern'ed in the application, like getopt's optarg - i.e. problem. Since I'm not directly interested in this function, I'm not going to take this further. Just wanted the archives to have all the info. Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/