On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 08:47:15PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 08:59:35PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote: >>> Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>> I don't think it is that simple. Cygwin doesn't use the getopt that >>>> comes with newlib. >>> >>> Ah. Just because I'm curious, why? >>> >>>> Is there supposed to be any correspondence between >>>> the getopt version and the getsubopt version? >>> >>> I've just looked at newlib's getsubopt.c. It is completely >>> independent of getopt, and in fact, has only been in newlib since >>> 1.11.0. >>> So, unless I've overlooked something, it *is* just a matter of >>> cygwin.din/version.h. >> >> Ok, then. Thanks for checking. Getting ready to gratefully accept a >> patch. > >Just got round to looking at doing this. It uses a variable in the library, >extern'ed in the application, like getopt's optarg - i.e. problem. > >Since I'm not directly interested in this function, I'm not going to take >this further. Just wanted the archives to have all the info.
NP. Thanks for researching. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/