On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 03:47:39AM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: >On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>And, no, screen becoming screwed up in an rxvt session is not a show >>stopper. > >Yes, but it's something that will make all screen users not upgrade to >1.5.6 or downgrade to 1.5.5 when they see how broken it's. Broken >dettach / reattach is nothing compared with such a problem. > >BTW, it's broken in everything (rxvt, XTerm, and cmd.exe). > >I guess it'd be a show stopper if screen were part of Cygwin. Still, I >think it's more important than Vim, as there are a dozen editors but no >screen alternatives.
That's truly amazing logic. 1) Vim is probably the most popular editor in cygwin. 2) It's a SEGV from cygwin. It would be folly to ignore those. 3) As you note, screen doesn't even ship with cygwin. >Anyway, I did what I could, reporting it before 1.5.6 - >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-12/msg00557.html . I'm not >complaining. I also reported it to the screen mailing-list today as >there are a few Cygwin users and one may be able to help you with it. "Help me with it". Yeah. That's one way to look at it. Why don't you help *us* with it by debugging the problem? I don't really care about screen but if it's important to you then some hours with gdb might be in order. That's what I do with problems that I care about. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
