Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
"Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| It looks to me like the cygwin/newlib combination is not being compliant if
| it implements isnan as a function rather than a macro. I couldn't see
| anything in the standard that says it can be a function, and every reference
| to it describes it as a macro, not a function. It may be the case that
| libstdc++ is within its rights to assume that isnan is a macro after all.
yes, isnan and friends are supposed to be macros only, not functions.
I'll start working on a newlib patch for this.
| OTOH it may be that libstdc++ was only supposed to be shadowing those ctype
| macros that are guaranteed to have underlying function implementations; I
| don't know what the shadowing is for, so I can't comment.
libstdc++ is supposed to shadow ctype macros -- and it also expect
them to have a function implementation.
-- Gaby
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/