"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 01:48:14AM +0100, Darryl Miles wrote:
Is my more technical discussion better put onto the cygwin-patches list
?
No. The mailing list descriptions really are accurate. If you don't
have a patch, then you shouldn't be sending email to cygwin-patches.
Most cygwin development discussion occurs on the main list or on
cygwin-apps.
Basically The general rule for cygwin apps appears to be that the first
messgage in a thread has to
be about creation of new packages, or discussions about packaging policy.
(Also requests for uploads go to that list).
Then the disussion can drift a little to more general cygwin development,
but should still be in the context of a specific package.
Also, discussion of the development of setup.exe usually takes place on
cygwin-apps, because that is the designated list for discussing bugs in
setup.exe
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
