On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 03:42:00PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote: > > "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > > > >No. The mailing list descriptions really are accurate. If you don't > >have a patch, then you shouldn't be sending email to cygwin-patches. > > > > Most cygwin development discussion occurs on the main list or on > cygwin-apps.
And of course the discussion and methodology behind the internal development of the cygwin libraries, issues, and future ideas is - in true opensource form (NOT) - on a completely closed list, invite-only, with no public access to any form of archives. What exactly is the positive purpose behind that? "cygwin-developers: a by-approval developers list for discussing the internals of the Cygwin DLL and all components of the "winsup" directory. Discussions of upcoming net releases are also appropriate. Subscription requests are handled on a case-by-case basis. Only subscribers may submit email to this list. Please do not attempt to join the cygwin-developers mailing list unless 1) you are thoroughly familiar with the cygwin DLL, 2) you have successfully built the DLL from source, 3) you contributed at least one patch to the Cygwin DLL or its utilities, and 4) you intend on being a long-term contributor. Please do not ask for "read-only" access to this mailing list. You either qualify or you don't. There is no middle ground." -cl -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
