On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:11:56PM -0400, Igor Peshansky wrote: >On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Linda Walsh wrote: >>As for including cygcheck, I don't have a problem doing that when >>necessary, but I prefer to check that it's not some "braino", or that >>it is a "real" problem before attaching a full cygdump. > >How will we know if it's a real problem unless you include the cygcheck >output?
Right. There is no harm in including it and, since it is more than likely that we'd need it, including it eliminates one information-free cycle of email. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/