Re: Reason for cygwin GCC 2.97 non-bootstrap found

[DJ Delorie]

> The point being?  There's _still_ no reason it _must_ be done
> in libiberty.

No, but a generic valloc would make sense in libiberty.  If the final
solution includes a generic valloc implementation, it might make more
sense to put that in libiberty rather than gcc.

You're right that it's not a *pressing* reason, but it is something to
consider.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]