Vocabulary check... At 23:23 2001-06-26, Christopher Faylor wrote: >... > >Ah yes, another "should be". Sigh. > >It doesn't matter how complete you make a FAQ. There will always be >people who can't assimilate information unless they've engaged in a long >torturous dialog. The FAQ can *never* have every single answer to every >single question. "Torturous" or "tortuous?" Both? >... > >cgf Randall -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Re: Blunt Tools (was:... Warren Young
- Re: Blunt Tools (was: cgf does... Ken Collins
- Re: Blunt Tools (was: cgf ... John Fortin
- Re: Blunt Tools (was: cgf ... Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Re: Blunt Tools (was:... Ken Collins
- Re: Blunt Tools (... Christopher Faylor
- Re: Blunt Tools (... Ken Collins
- Re: Blunt Tools (... Christopher Faylor
- Re: Blunt Tools (... Warren Young
- Re: Blunt Tools (... Christopher Faylor
- Re: Blunt Tools (... Randall R Schulz
- Re: Blunt Tools (... Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Re: Blunt Tools (was:... Warren Young
- Re: Blunt Tools (was: cgf ... Christopher Faylor
- Re: Blunt Tools (was:... Ken Collins
- Re: Blunt Tools (was: cgf does not... Randall R Schulz
- Re: Blunt Tools (was: cgf does not wan... Michael Schaap
- RE: Blunt Tools (was: cgf does not want pri... Glen Coakley
- Re: Blunt Tools (was: cgf does not wan... Christopher Faylor
- RE: Blunt Tools (was: cgf does not want pri... Mark Keil
- Re: Blunt Tools (was: cgf does not wan... Christopher Faylor
