From: "Fred T. Hamster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > i for one cannot accept the rationale being promulgated that a system > for unix emulation on win32 should be ignorant of the native platform's > path specification, when calling into the environment from windows is > clearly a desirable capability. to me, that rationale seems to It would also be nice to see more said of other alternatives, such as UWIN, and how the compare with Cygwin. I'm sure they have good ideas we can reuse, just as Cygwin has good ideas they can reuse. --binkley -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Re: Cygwin: Interoperabili... Fred T. Hamster
- Re: Cygwin: Interoper... Robert Praetorius
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (was: tw... Christopher Faylor
- documentation & dear love Jason Dufair
- Re: documentation & dear love Christopher Faylor
- Re: documentation & dear l... Bret Jordan
- Re: documentation & de... Michael A. Chase
- Re: documentation & de... Christopher Faylor
- Re: documentation & dear l... David Starks-Browning
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (was: tw... Fred T. Hamster
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (wa... B. K. Oxley \(binkley\)
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System?... Christopher Faylor
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (wa... Charles S. Wilson
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System?... Christopher Faylor
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (wa... Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (wa... Ken Collins
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System?... Christopher Faylor
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (wa... Christopher Faylor
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System?... Christopher Faylor
- RE: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (was: tw... John Wiersba
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (was: tw... Fred T. Hamster
