At 11:11 AM 6/27/2001, Fred T. Hamster wrote: > i'm satisfied for now that the polarization against win32 wildcards is such that >only a patch which can be analyzed would even have a chance of changing any opinions. > expect that the issue may re-arise and include some code for consideration in a >month or two. Exactly. This is always the best way to get your point across. It provides concrete specifics which others can clearly comment and suggest changes. Thanks for deciding to join in! :-) Larry Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (was: two problems with cygwin's zip)
Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) Wed, 27 Jun 2001 08:58:22 -0700
- Re: documentation & dear love Christopher Faylor
- Re: documentation & dear l... Bret Jordan
- Re: documentation & de... Michael A. Chase
- Re: documentation & de... Christopher Faylor
- Re: documentation & dear l... David Starks-Browning
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (was: tw... Fred T. Hamster
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (wa... B. K. Oxley \(binkley\)
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System?... Christopher Faylor
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (wa... Charles S. Wilson
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System?... Christopher Faylor
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (wa... Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (wa... Ken Collins
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System?... Christopher Faylor
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (wa... Christopher Faylor
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System?... Christopher Faylor
- RE: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (was: tw... John Wiersba
- Re: Cygwin: Open or Closed System? (was: tw... Fred T. Hamster
