On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote:
> Nonsense. If you can't see any difference between terrorists and > résistants you are either wilfully ignorant or confused. > > A terrorist strikes symbolic targets, preferably undefended ones. A > résistant strikes at the occupying power. > > Of course it is possible for one and the same person to be both - it is > behavior that defines the terrorist. So when an al-Quaida member takes > on a US patrol, he may define himself as some kind of soldier in that > encounter. It doesn't change the fact of his complicity in the murder of > innocents, which makes him a terrorist as well. And who might those symbols be for? The 'occupying power' per chance? -- ____________________________________________________________________ The law is applied philosophy and a philosphical system is only as valid as its first principles. James Patrick Kelly - "Wildlife" [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ssz.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.open-forge.org --------------------------------------------------------------------