I think I'll stick to my bicycle. Why would anyone would want to waste their money on a car like that? Or even trust their body to it? I suppose insurance companies might have an interest in limiting use of a car to people who were paid-up. An even if cars were "like little tanks" why not open them with ordinary physical keys, like real tanks? At least if someone nicks your keys they leave your body behind. I want to use my retinas for seeing with.
Jan Dobrucki wrote: > I have been thinking about the window problem and the ignition too. > What I was thinking was a car of the not so far future. Where there > wont be any windows because the driver will see the outside throu a > camera and he wont need regular lights cause there'll be ultraviolet > or something like that. The car will be like a little tank, so to > speak. If the thief can't get in, then the ignition problem wouldn't > exist. So someone can steel the pgp keys of the driver, but what if > the key was, say a tatoe on his hand and would be visible only when > the drivers was thinking of say... green fried tomatoes. > Ok, so the thief managed to get into the car. There still voice > recognition, fingerprints, retina scan, DNA scan, and whatever you > can think of. I know this will be expensive, but in the future, well > lets just say I don't think it's going to be sweet.
