Except for one thing - some of us run our own mail servers and pay for the
bandwith.  Sure, I can delete at the server all I want, but, the mail has
to first go through SMTP before it can be chucked.  It's still a waste of
bandwith and processing.

Look at it this way also.  If everyone (call it E for most of the
subscribers) that subscribes to a CDR has to delete the same piece of
email, then you have E*sizeof(spam) worth of wasted bandwith spread
amongst E receivers, and the CDR node has to spend all it's time sending
the shit.

Would be nice if the MTA did spam (and Choate) recognition on the fly.  
If anyone has such an MTA, that would be great.

All that filtering does is prevents you from seeing the offending
emails.  They still consume resources.  And should you use pop or imap,
your client still has to go and check the headers and possibly body of the
email before deciding to delete it or fetch it.

----------------------Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---------------------------
 + ^ + :Surveillance cameras|Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\
  \|/  :aren't security.  A |share them, you don't hang them on your/\|/\
<--*-->:camera won't stop a |monitor, or under your keyboard, you   \/|\/
  /|\  :masked killer, but  |don't email them, or put them on a web  \|/
 + v + :will violate privacy|site, and you must change them very often.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sunder.net ------------

On Sun, 5 May 2002, Anonymous User wrote:

> "mondo96" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Einstein I have to dowload your crap before I can filter it,maybe 
> > you could learn to filter the porn and spam on your node
> 
> The email client you used to write this message, Microsoft Outlook
> Express, supports "delete from server" and "do not download from server"
> filtering options.  You can use these in combination with the "From"
> address to filter Choate's spam.
> 
> Examples:
> 
> http://www.pwrtc.com/~wdegroot/oefilters.html
> http://www.interaccess.com/tech/MSOLEfiltering.html
> http://homepage.tinet.ie/~kilimanjaro/block.htm
> http://www.triwest.net/spam.htm

Reply via email to