Re: tangled context probe

[Tyler Durden]

Well, when you put it that way, that changes everything.
All is now clear. Please continue downloading the syntactic mappings of 
random neural firing...I'm using your output to seed a random number 
generator.

Oh, and don't forget to cc Choate.
-TD

From: "R.W. (Bob) Erickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tyler Durden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED],  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: tangled context probe
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:27:08 -0500
Tyler Durden wrote:
As to the crypto relevance: context Arranged signals can be anything at 
all. If you don't share the context of the communicators, you have no 
idea what they  convey in their conversation about the "whether".

That's a stretch. Soon you'll say that Post-modernist literary theory is 
Cypherpunkish content because it deals with 'context'.

I suggest you take up your theories with Mr Choate and the Dallas 
Cypherpunk(s). In that 'context' your posts will appear lucid.

-TD
No,  all that european bs is only relevent because it adds to the piling  
evidence of irrationality.
Whats the connect between irrationality an C-punks?
Well aside from colorful characters
its also key to any understanding of the minimum mass mind.
There are policy implications inherent in innate incomplitence and 
compliance.

There are also important ecconomic understandings
that hinge upon understanding irrational choices
c.f hyperbolic discounting, aka matching theory.
There are also techie implications:
The human semantic competency is hackable
--bob