Re: tangled context probe

[R.W. (Bob) Erickson]

Tyler Durden wrote:
As to the crypto relevance: context Arranged signals can be anything 
at all. If you don't share the context of the communicators, you have 
no idea what they  convey in their conversation about the "whether".

That's a stretch. Soon you'll say that Post-modernist literary theory 
is Cypherpunkish content because it deals with 'context'.

I suggest you take up your theories with Mr Choate and the Dallas 
Cypherpunk(s). In that 'context' your posts will appear lucid.

-TD
No,  all that european bs is only relevent because it adds to the 
piling  evidence of irrationality.
Whats the connect between irrationality an C-punks?
Well aside from colorful characters
its also key to any understanding of the minimum mass mind.
There are policy implications inherent in innate incomplitence and 
compliance.

There are also important ecconomic understandings
that hinge upon understanding irrational choices
c.f hyperbolic discounting, aka matching theory.
There are also techie implications:
The human semantic competency is hackable
--bob