> >Based on Moore's Law, this means it will be secure on computers roughly > >10,000 times more powerful than today's systems. How likely is that? >Its not hard to imagine, if all we're talking about is brute force attacks. Those are essentially the numbers I came up with as well. However (and I admit to being fairly new to this), how many current schemes can be broken solely through brute force? Are any of them vulnerable to more elegant (albeit computationally intensive) attacks? Jarrod
- Next-Generation Encryption Algorithm "Camellia"... Nobuki Nakatuji
- Re: Next-Generation Encryption Algorithm "Came... Joseph Ashwood
- RE: Next-Generation Encryption Algorithm "Came... Frates, Jarrod A.
- RE: Next-Generation Encryption Algorithm "Came... Frates, Jarrod A.
- RE: Next-Generation Encryption Algorithm "Came... Frates, Jarrod A.