> Personally, I think the market for casual-grade untraceability is
> limited. Which is not to say that the market for high-grade
> untraceabily is any better. Most people don't think much about
> security.
You'd think the one area where there would be a market for reasonably good
untraceability is online discussion boards, particularly the financial
forums. Every week there is an article about another company suing its
online critics. And so far the yahoos and aols have just rolled over and
provided the real identities behind the flimsy protection of nicknames.
In today's litigious world, anyone who publicly posts articles critical
of the policies or management of a business must be aware of the dangers.
A good quality anonymous message board would be highly attractive.
While we're fantasizing, let's imagine that it uses some kind of crypto
credential system to prevent abuse. Is this feasible?
