On July 21, 2016 11:59:37 AM EDT, juan <juan....@gmail.com> wrote: >On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 06:56:56 -0400 >John <j...@synfin.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On July 21, 2016 5:21:04 AM EDT, juan <juan....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:51:49 +0000 >> >Sean Lynch <se...@literati.org> wrote: >> > >> >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:59 PM juan <juan....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:44:16 +0300 >> >> > Georgi Guninski <gunin...@guninski.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > Instead of only bashing tor, why not discuss the alternatives >> >> > > and move to something allegedly better? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > We need to get rid of tor first. Resources wasted on tor >> >are >> >> > resources that can't be used in good projects. >> >> > >> >> >> >> They are not your resources to redirect, >> > >> > No they are not mine. They belong to the people who the US >> > gov't/military robs. No taxes no tor. >> >> Well, phrasing I guess, but most of the relays just belong to >> volunteers. > > Apologies John, I really don't mean to pick on you > personally. > > I'd point out though that the organization exists thanks to > state funding. The whole thing would be rather different if all > the participants were volunteers. > > (are all high speed nodes also run by and paid for volunteers?) >
Good question, i actually don't know the answer.. I expect the relationships get pretty incestuous at the higher levels. The top 10 "public" relays are all doing in the range of 50MB/s+.... You can browse the public relays here - https://atlas.torproject.org/ For comparison, my relay, when it's up, is capped at 200KB/s. John -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
