Better still would be a way for any number of list servers to co-exist without delivering multiple copies of mail.
This would allow anyone to set up another server at will and add robustness to the system. Is this already in existence or a new idea, is it even a valid idea? On 23 August 2016 10:46:14 GMT+01:00, Zenaan Harkness <z...@freedbms.net> wrote: >On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:07:51AM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 03:51:23PM -0700, Riad S. Wahby wrote: >> > Folks, >> > >> > After 15+ years running a cypherpunks node, it's quitting time for >me. >> > I plan to delete the mailman aliases on September 30th. >> > >> > If anyone is interested in migrating the list to his or her machine >> > before then, that would be great; let's discuss on-list. >> > >> >> So far I saw two offers to host the list after 30.Sep. >> >> IMHO two or more future lists won't hurt. Everyone can set a >> cypherpunks list (but won't get the past reputation of this one, if >any). > >Is there a way to set up two or three email servers acting in >concensus, >basically mirrormiring each other, but not duplicating emails to the >subscribers? > >That way there'd be less time pressure when one person wants to move on >(Riad, you're a gentleman - thank you again.) -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.