TL;DR - I grew up in Austin, TX and was inundated with fucking Alex Jones lunacy from a young age.
Yes - Hillary is a corrupt, lying, war-crazy cunt. That doesn't make Alex Jones any less of a fucking maniac. And fuck Trump too, the bloviating clown. -- John > On Aug 26, 2016, at 11:51 PM, Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 04:59:16AM -0400, John wrote: >>> On July 8, 2016 8:11:53 PM EDT, Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Alex Jones says the media should not ignore Putin's warnings of >> >> Alex Jones is completely fucking unhinged.. he is occasionally right >> in the same sense that some one shooting at a barn occasionally gets >> off a good shot. > > > > > > Well well well, Hillary Clinton decided to go to war with Alex Jones :D > :D :D > > > Now THAT speaks volumes about her (their) campaign self confidence etc. > > > Frankly, this is bloody hilarious: > > > > > > ** Hillary Clinton declares war on Infowars. Alex Jones fires back with > devastating Hillary video > (http://theduran.com/hillary-clinton-declares-war-infowars-alex-jones-fires-back-devastating-hillary-video/) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > By Alex Christoforou on Aug 26, 2016 04:07 pm > alex jones > > Hillary Clinton fired the first shots, saying that Alex Jones claimed > ‘no children’ died at Sandy Hook…even going off teleprompter script to > lament that Alex Jones has a “black heart.” > > IFRAME: > [1]http://www.youtube.com/embed/2cfEW9av2XU?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent > > Alex Jones fired back at Hillary, and absolutely crushes HRC in an epic > video retaliation…connecting Hillary to Libya war crimes, Saudi Arabia > 9-11 attacks, KKK collaboration, and even pulling up a video archive > where Hillary advocates building a wall to keep Mexican immigrants out > of the United States. > > Alex Jones ends his reply saying, > > “I know who you are. > > I know the Klan financed you’re first campaigns, from the people that > were there. I know who you are, and as an American and as a patriot, I > am not scared of you bully.” > > IFRAME: > [2]http://www.youtube.com/embed/B1hBQ_6FYso?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent > > The Clinton campaign is in a tailspin. Going after Infowars in a > campaign speech is getting pretty desperate. > > Playing the race card is also a clear sign that Clinton is loosing the > narrative, falling back on the standard liberal “you’re a racist” > argument, in an effort to deflect attention away from a constant barrage > of email scandals and corruption pouring over HRC like never ending > waves. > > The post Hillary Clinton declares war on Infowars. Alex Jones fires back > with devastating Hillary video > (http://theduran.com/hillary-clinton-declares-war-infowars-alex-jones-fires-back-devastating-hillary-video/) > appeared first on The Duran (http://theduran.com) . > > References > > 1. > http://www.youtube.com/embed/2cfEW9av2XU > 2. > http://www.youtube.com/embed/B1hBQ_6FYso > > > > > > > (And an aside, Julian Assange stating the obvious: > > ** Julian Assange tells Megyn Kelly, ‘Hillary Clinton is in bed with > neocons, Trump is no Russian agent’ > (http://theduran.com/julian-assange-debunks-russia-hack-narrative-tell-megyn-kelly/) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > By Alex Christoforou on Aug 26, 2016 05:09 pm > assange kelly > > This is part two of Fox News’ Megyn Kelly interview with Julian Assange. > You can find part one here. > (http://theduran.com/julian-assange-tells-megyn-kelly-new-hillary-clinton-emails-released-before-november-vote-video/) > > IFRAME: > [1]http://www.youtube.com/embed/_rLeuydV1xM?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent > > Assange discusses how connected Seth Rich’s death is to the Wikileaks > DNC email leak…but most notably, Assange warns Megyn Kelly about > Clinton’s constant Russia warmongering… > > “I would like to believe that -no organization- no media organization in > the United States, would not have published the DNC emails. But I don’t > think thats true actually. > > I think MSNBC wouldn’t have published them. I think the New York Times > wouldn’t have published most of them. And that’s sad. It says incredible > politicisation in this election of the media. > > And it is a bit concerning, the allegations, -that- by the Clinton > campaign, that everyone is a Russian agent, are really disturbing. Why > is that? > > Well because, bizarrely, Hillary Clinton the Democrat, has -become- has > positioned herself now to be the security candidate. She’s palled up > with the neocons responsible for the Iraq war. And she’s grabbed on to > this kind of neo-McCarthyist hysteria about Russia, and is using that to > demonize the Trump campaign. > > The Trump campaign has all sorts of things wrong with it, but as far as > we can see, being Russian agents is not one of them.” > > The post Julian Assange tells Megyn Kelly, ‘Hillary Clinton is in bed > with neocons, Trump is no Russian agent’ > (http://theduran.com/julian-assange-debunks-russia-hack-narrative-tell-megyn-kelly/) > appeared first on The Duran (http://theduran.com) . > > References > > 1. > http://www.youtube.com/embed/_rLeuydV1xM?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent > > > > > > > > (And for those who really want some self mutilation reading on the HRC > front: > > ** Hillary Clinton’s Ceausescu moment. An American dictator’s > controversial speech > (http://theduran.com/hillary-clintons-ceasescu-moment/) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > By Adam Garrie on Aug 26, 2016 05:46 pm > 24 Nov 1989, Bucharest, Romania --- Romanian President Nicolae Ceausescu > speaks passionately during the closing ceremony of the Romanian > Communist Party's 14th congress in Bucharest, on November 24, 1989. His > wife Elena sits next to him (bottom left). --- Image by © Bernard > Bisson/Sygma/Corbis > > Hillary Clinton has delivered a speech that may well go down in the > annals of history as her Ceaușescu moment. > > Whilst she got all of the terminology incorrect, Clinton’s attack on her > most critical opponents singled the fact that what I have called the > alternative-globalism has sent fear to the heart of the traditional > neo-liberal/neo-con globalist establishment. > > She called all media which refuses to read from the BBC/CNN script the > ‘alt-right’. This is an odd choice of words for several reasons. > > First of all alternative media is comprised of and watched by > individuals with ideologies that can be described as both left and > right. There is no rigid ideological exam one must pass in order to > realise that mainstream media in the West twist information, tell > untruths and act as cover for a failing and corrupt political elite. > > Secondly, the old definitions of left and right are in shift. > Neo-liberal globalism is as much of a source of continuation for those > concerned about cultural erosion and the attack on nation states as it > is for members of the global labour movement and those concerned with > international human rights. > > The fact of the matter is, according to traditional definitions, Hillary > Clinton’s campaign is the most far right in modern American history. > Here’s why: > 1. She has a total disregard for constitutional protections against > presidential powers to wage illegal wars (according to both US and > international law) > 2. Her policy of regime change is an assertive hawkish policy which has > total disregard for the lives of civilians, the sovereignty of > foreign states, territorial integrity of the modern political map and > the charter of the United Nations. > 3. She has no time for individual rights and is a key supporter of the > modern mass surveillance state. > 4. She ruthlessly bullies her opponents and when that doesn’t work. she > resorts to corruption and worse, only some of which has been exposed > by Wikileaks…more is apparently yet to come. Think South American > style fascism in the second half of the 20^th century. > 5. The principles of free speech, investigative journalism and > whistleblowing; principles which helped expose the corruption of the > Nixon government (which in hindsight is rather minor in comparison to > what the Clintons get up to), are totally disregarded. Her threats > against whistle blowers are disturbing indeed. > 6. Her flippancy about the executions of foreign leaders sounds > pathological. > 7. Her fixation with ‘bringing down Russia’ would make even the biggest > Cold Warrior a bit nervous. > > And yet she calls herself the candidate of the left, somehow standing > against what she calls an ‘alt-right’? > > The fact is that she is worried that Trump’s populist tone combined with > very centrist policies is exposing her campaign as one built around > failed policies which do not reach out to people. > > Trump is far more anti-war than she is, Trump talks about jobs and > labour rights far more than she does, Trump speaks to the concerns of > ordinary people, whilst she makes it seems that the average American’s > biggest fear is concern with the existence of a man called Vladimir > Putin. > > She is out of touch in more than one way. > > The biggest oddity in an odd speech was when she called Putin the > ‘godfather’ of the ‘alt-right’. > > Someone like Clinton, whose tactics with opponents are scandalous at > best and suspicious at worse shouldn’t really be making mafia metaphors. > > The notion that Vladimir Putin is controlling everyone in the world who > opposes traditional globalism is farcical and since many in America > don’t even know a great deal about modern Russia, the constant > scapegoating of Putin is as stupid as it is ineffective. > > The truth is that the global movement against corruption, against war, > against the treatment of whistle-blowers, against supranational > government, against systematic abuses of human rights, is organic, > multi-national, multi-cultural and multi-lingual. > > It shows the power of people and the power of ideas, liberated as they > are by new media, combining to say ‘enough is enough’. > > The fact that Putin hasn’t condemned this does not imply some > conspiracy, it implies he is comfortable with the changing world he > lives in, unlike Hillary Clinton who is sounding more and more like a > robotic, monotonous Ceaușescu, addressing a crowed of his countrymen who > were fed up with him. > > The post Hillary Clinton’s Ceausescu moment. An American dictator’s > controversial speech > (http://theduran.com/hillary-clintons-ceasescu-moment/) appeared first > on The Duran (http://theduran.com) . >
