On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 21:29:20 -0800
Razer <g...@riseup.net> wrote:
> Missed this
>
>
>
> > JB: So why isn't "fascism" merely seen as being another form of
> > "Socialism"?
>
> Fascism is National Socialism.
That's the only thing rayzer got one third right. Funnily
enough, after constant rants against fascists, he admits that
they are socialists...exactly like himself. Rayzer is just as
unhinged and incoherent as james donald (and both are
anti-conspiracy nutcases - hardly surprising)
> As opposed to international socialism
> where there's ostensibly as much concern for the worker in some
> foreign country making your clothing as there would be for your own
> workers.
so....the diference betwen fascists and commies is that
commies want to enslave the whole world.
>
> It's an Ideal... BUT it's an ideal that IS possible to accomplish.
> Cuba is the olny country in my lifetime that's even come close...
and rayzer breaks his own record in the unhinged game. Cuba is
a nation state and allegedly socialist. So cuba is pretty much
'national' 'socialism'. Or 'national' 'communism'. Or fascism.
Or something. Or anything, given the complete confusion in
rayzer's mind and political classification.
And furthermore
"Benign (or at least non-malignant) totalitarianism is
possible. Monarchies tend to be that."
No doubt a totalitarian, national, commie cesspool like cuba can
be described as a monarchy.
