I answered the question, and won't reiterate.
On 02/02/2017 11:37 PM, jim bell wrote: > > > > *From:* James A. Donald <jam...@echeque.com> > > On 2/3/2017 2:14 AM, Razer wrote: > > >> Right. Nazis have no right to be espousing the extermination of people > >> because of ethnic or other fate-of-birth traits alone. > > > >But none of the people you are calling nazis and beating up have > espoused the extermination of ethnic groups. > > >Rather you equate disagreeing with the left on any of enormous number of > points with nazism. There is hardly anyone on the Republican side of > politics, and not many on the Democrat side, that are progressive enough > to be not be nazis. > > > Excellent point: > On 2/01/2017, at 11:20, I asked, and then answered my own question, > since Razer didn't provide any answer: > I asked: >>> >>So, is there any reliable way to distinguish a mere "conservative" >>> from a "fascist"? >>> >>> [no response by Razer, so I said,] >>> >>> I wish you'd have been able to answer this question. >>> [end] >>> >> To Razer and his ilk, a "Nazi", or "fascist", is simply a person >> more-rightward than [fill in the blank], where that "fill in the >> blank" is probably a leftist. >> >> Jim Bell > > > >
