> On Feb 10, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Razer <g...@riseup.net> wrote: > > On 02/10/2017 10:28 AM, Joshua Case wrote: >> meaning, you won’t interact with me unless it’s in front of other people? > > Yup. That's Eggs-ackly what I mean. > >> because you need that level of attention? > > > No. Because you need the pubic 'exposure'. >
As an unintelligent person, with some kind of physical disability which causes slow cognition - a precondition of genetic nature maybe? As 'sperm on the ground', or am I a fascist too now? Can people of color be fascist? I'm uninformed. Would be really fascinating to hear your thoughts. >> I was just trying to reduce the level of idiocy before i just plain muted >> you, like everyone else on this list has, and are imploring me to do. > > Odd. More intelligent people seem to respond to my posting, when they feel > it, than I've seen responding to yours. But posting items to a list isn't a > popularity contest ... now is it? I don’t copy-paste off topic news story links to the list nearly as much as you do, no, and you are an effective troll. true. > It's really an insight of your interests, to others on the list...(and fwiw I > don't consider the fascist trolls like Z, J, 'The Donald', and tentatively > the wordy but still socially ignorant JB, really intelligent. Unless you > consider reptilian aliens 'intelligent' in any way but socially vicious > intelligence.) > > > Just like you're wasting my time responding to you. For the last time. It’s been a nice ride. Thanks! > > Rr > > >> >>> On Feb 10, 2017, at 1:12 PM, Razer <g...@riseup.net >>> <mailto:g...@riseup.net>> wrote: >>> >>> That's right. I'm insulting your intellect. >>> >>> Don't contact me offlist again schmuck. I'm too busy for you nonsesne >>> >>> On 02/10/2017 10:07 AM, Joshua Case wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> So are the people who run world governments that commit Genocide and the >>>>> officers of corporations poisoning the planet (and our minds, with >>>>> advertising of the products causing the physical poisoning). >>>>> >>>>> You aren't making your case spewball. >>>>> >>>>> "Rational" is relative. >>>>> >>>>> Rr >>>>> >>>>>> I don’t agree with Jim on all points, hardly any maybe, but i’fe heard >>>>>> his stuff, listened to him talk. he’s rational, it seems. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> That’s all you’ve got? An obvious and blatant strawman fallacy and some >>>> intellect insult? And no, rational is not relative - it’s not everywhere, >>>> but it’s not relative. It has a precise definition, and there is a >>>> mathematical proof for it. >>>> >>>> You might spend more time reading, less time writing for a while. >>>> >>>> Unless you’re just a paid troll to keep this list off topic, undermining >>>> productive countercultural projects and coordination. In which case, great >>>> work. Keep hitting send! >>>> >>> >> >
