meaning, you won’t interact with me unless it’s in front of other people? because you need that level of attention? I was just trying to reduce the level of idiocy before i just plain muted you, like everyone else on this list has, and are imploring me to do.
i’m not insecure with respect to my intellect, or schmuckiness - i’m alarmed that you’d use such a patriarchal type of genitals insult. i’m smart enough to see through people like you, and i am not a penis. > On Feb 10, 2017, at 1:12 PM, Razer <g...@riseup.net> wrote: > > That's right. I'm insulting your intellect. > > Don't contact me offlist again schmuck. I'm too busy for you nonsesne > > On 02/10/2017 10:07 AM, Joshua Case wrote: >> >> >>> >>> So are the people who run world governments that commit Genocide and the >>> officers of corporations poisoning the planet (and our minds, with >>> advertising of the products causing the physical poisoning). >>> >>> You aren't making your case spewball. >>> >>> "Rational" is relative. >>> >>> Rr >>> >>>> I don’t agree with Jim on all points, hardly any maybe, but i’fe heard his >>>> stuff, listened to him talk. he’s rational, it seems. >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> That’s all you’ve got? An obvious and blatant strawman fallacy and some >> intellect insult? And no, rational is not relative - it’s not everywhere, >> but it’s not relative. It has a precise definition, and there is a >> mathematical proof for it. >> >> You might spend more time reading, less time writing for a while. >> >> Unless you’re just a paid troll to keep this list off topic, undermining >> productive countercultural projects and coordination. In which case, great >> work. Keep hitting send! >> >
