On Fri, 5 May 2017 18:34:58 -0400 Steve Kinney <ad...@pilobilus.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 05/05/2017 03:24 PM, juan wrote: > > On Thu, 4 May 2017 20:33:56 -0400 Steve Kinney > > <ad...@pilobilus.net> wrote: > > > > > >> > >> The State fully endorses the Scientician approach, as the State's > >> sole function is to transfer money and power from the poor to the > >> rich at the fastest practicable rate. As always, symbolic > >> "initiatives" and strongly worded press releases are sufficient > >> responses to public pressure to "do something" about, for > >> instance, global warming. > > > > > > Well, the global-warming end-of-the-world scenario is just state > > propaganda. And notice that *global* warming requires a *global* > > solution, like, say, 'monitoring' and controlling the 'carbon > > footprint' of every individual. Pretty convenient, the world is > > saved and the whole world's population gets fully domesticated. > > So in short, you are telling us you don't know anything about > geophysics and don't need to find out: I think I know more about physics and its manipulation by state mafias than you do. > Your version of Political > Correctness provides final answers to all meaningful questions about > the human condition. That sounds more like conventional religious > fanaticism than the Scientician faith. bottom line : you criticize the scientific mafia ONLY if they say stuff you don't like. When your scientfic, state-funded mafia vomits nonsense about the global reheating apocalypsis, you love them. > > The technological, fascist 'progressives' are basically correct > > when they say that all technical problems can be solved. So if you > > expect their technical plans to catastrophically fail, you'll wait > > forever. > > > > > > Aldous Huxley - The Ultimate Revolution > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WaUkZXKA30 > > There's that Scientician faith in action! Not sure what you mean. Do you have any counterarguments for Huxley? So far, apart from your enviro-friendly, off-topic tangent, I don't think you said anything too relevant to the problem of technically efficient propaganda, brainwashing, mind-control or whatever term is appropriate.