Just to be clear, since juan and other get their panties in a wad if even the possibility of God is mentioned, I AM claiming that Christians are BIASed about the issue of god -- they think it's Jesus.
Talk about an opportunity that was missed by the intelligensia. \0x On 5/8/17, \0xDynamite <dreamingforw...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I think I know more about physics and its manipulation by state >>>> mafias than you do.i ii >>> >>> What's your evidence that anthropogenic climate change is a massive >>> hoax? >>> I know we've been through this before and I don't want another flame >>> fest.... I'm genuinely curious. >> >> It is not exactly a hoax. Rather, they cherry pick the evidence, >> torture the data, use nonsensical statistical methods, and reject >> unwanted evidence as error, as for example >> https://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/08/the-smoking-gun-at-darwin-zero/ > > Given the website you cited, I think YOU are cherry picking your > methodology. > > I'll make this simple, dumbasses. You don't need ANY evidence to > conclude LOGICALLY and NECESSARY that billions of years of fossil fuel > burned in 400 years of industrialism is going to have MASSIVE effects. > Do you understand, billions of years of solar input stored in oil and > coal reserves is completely burned within 1/10000000 of that same > time? > > The attempt to prove with any other methodology is a red herring. But > the real truth IS more complex and that is what keeps the problem > unsettled. The climate, after industrialism, is like a pendulum > between unstable attractors: ICE Age or Desertification of the Earth. > > The resolution of that swing is reconciled with only one variable: GOD. > > If you reject that possibility prima facie, then you see why nothing > gets reconciled or stable: BIAS. > > \0x >