On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 5:22 AM, James A. Donald <jam...@echeque.com> wrote: > I cannot see how this impairs my rights, or anyone's rights, other than the > right of invaders who hope to invade, kill me and take my stuff.
Many 'laws" around the world should not be interpreted by what they claim to do on the tin and for the near term, but by what they can do when grossly twisted by those who would wield them against you later. Time and again this holds true. Few have learned that, thus they continue to lose. It's time for something different. > I come in and go out by airport, where I already get survielled, so this > does not affect me in the slightest. In only affects people who are > swimming the Rio Grande and suchlike. That's exactly what you and most sheeple said about the "law" that was drafted and enacted to "get you surveilled", and the "law" before that, and before that, etc.
