On 07/31/2020 05:47 PM, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote: > On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 17:27:22 -0700 > Mirimir <miri...@riseup.net> wrote: > > >> >> But I suppose, in your happy anarchy, it could mean whatever cabrón >> develops some vaccine. > > are you mocking anarchy on an anarchist mailing list? Though of course, > in practice, this list is a statist shithole, and is its own infinite > self-parody, thanks to Jim and all the rest of technofascists. Hey, let's > have more termal cameras, retardphone tracking and 'vaccines' because of the > latest flu PSYOP.
I'm mocking the idea that anarchy is workable for the existing population, generally. I do live in a community that's fundamentally anarchic, although there is coordination and oversight through circles with modified consensus. And it generally works pretty well. However, it's a hugely self-selected community, with an explicit social contract, and members who don't play well get shunned and booted. I really don't think that such a community would work for random sheeple. So what's your path to anarchy? Love? Education? Kill the assholes? > STILL, if people on this list were actually 'cypherpunks', instead of > techno-fascist posers, then your comment would be as out of place as it > should be. There are no rules here, my friend :)
