Plagiarism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism


Plagiarism is the representation of another author's language, thoughts, ideas, 
or expressions as one's own original work.[1][2] In educational contexts, there 
are differing definitions of plagiarism depending on the institution.[3] 
Plagiarism is considered a violation of academic integrity and a breach of 
journalistic ethics. It is subject to sanctions such as penalties, suspension, 
expulsion from school[4] or work,[5] substantial fines[6][7] and even 
imprisonment.[8][9]

Generally, plagiarism is not in itself a crime, but like counterfeiting, fraud 
can be punished in a court[10][11] for prejudices caused by copyright 
infringement,[12][13] violation of moral rights,[14] or torts. In academia and 
industry, it is a serious ethical offense.[15][16] Plagiarism and copyright 
infringement overlap to a considerable extent, but they are not equivalent 
concepts,[17] and many types of plagiarism do not constitute copyright 
infringement, which is defined by copyright law and may be adjudicated by 
courts.

Not all countries hold the same beliefs about personal ownership of language or 
ideas. While some, such as India and Poland, consider plagiarism to be a crime 
liable for imprisonment,[18] in other countries the reiteration of another 
professional's work can be a sign of respect or flattery.[19] Students who move 
to the United States and other Western countries from countries where 
plagiarism is not frowned upon may find the transition difficult.[20]

Etymology and ancient history
Edit

In the 1st century, the use of the Latin word "plagiarius" (literally 
"kidnapper") to denote stealing someone else's creative work was pioneered by 
the Roman poet Martial, who complained that another poet had "kidnapped his 
verses". Plagiary, a derivative of plagiarus, was introduced into English in 
1601 by dramatist Ben Jonson during the Jacobean Era to describe someone guilty 
of literary theft.[15][21] The derived form plagiarism was introduced into 
English around 1620.[22] The Latin plagiārius, "kidnapper", and plagium, 
"kidnapping", have the root plaga ("snare", "net"), based on the Indo-European 
root *-plak, "to weave" (seen for instance in Greek plekein, Bulgarian "плета" 
pleta, and Latin plectere, all meaning "to weave").

It is frequently claimed that people in antiquity had no concept of plagiarism, 
or at least did not condemn it, and it only came to be seen as immoral much 
later, anywhere from the Age of Enlightenment in the 17th century to the 
Romantic movement in the 18th century. While people in antiquity found 
detecting plagiarism difficult due to the paucity of literate persons as well 
as long travel times, there are a considerable number of pre-Enlightenment 
authors who accuse others of plagiarism and consider it distasteful and 
scandalous, including the respected historians Polybius and Pliny the 
Elder.[23] The 3rd century Greek work Lives of the Eminent Philosophers 
mentions that Heraclides Ponticus was accused of plagiarizing (κλέψαντα αὐτὸν) 
a treatise on Heliod and Homer.[24][25] In Vitruvius's 7th book, he 
acknowledges his debt to earlier writers and attributes them; he also passes a 
strong condemnation of plagiarism: "So, while [earlier writers] deserve our 
thanks, those, on the contrary, deserve our reproaches, who steal the writings 
of such men and publish them as their own; and those also, who depend in their 
writings, not on their own ideas, but who enviously do wrong to the works of 
others and boast of it, deserve not merely to be blamed, but to be sentenced to 
actual punishment for their wicked course of life."[26] Vitruvius goes on to 
claim that "such things did not pass without strict chastisement"[26] and 
recounts a story where the well-read Aristophanes of Byzantium judged a poetry 
competition. Aristophanes caught most of the contestants in plagiarizing 
other's poems as their own; the king ordered the plagiarizers to confess they 
were thieves, and they were condemned in disgrace. While the story may be 
apocryphal, it shows that Vitruvius personally considered plagiarism 
reprehensible.[27]


Legal aspects
Edit


Hannah Glasse's signature at the top of the first chapter of her book, The Art 
of Cookery Made Plain and Easy, 6th Edition, 1758, an attempted defence against 
rampant plagiarism
Although plagiarism in some contexts is considered theft or stealing, the 
concept does not exist in a legal sense, although the use of someone else's 
work in order to gain academic credit may meet some legal definitions of 
fraud.[28] "Plagiarism" specifically is not mentioned in any current statute, 
either criminal or civil.[29][16] Some cases may be treated as unfair 
competition or a violation of the doctrine of moral rights.[16] In short, 
people are asked to use the guideline, "if you did not write it yourself, you 
must give credit".[30]

Plagiarism is not the same as copyright infringement. While both terms may 
apply to a particular act, they are different concepts, and false claims of 
authorship generally constitute plagiarism regardless of whether the material 
is protected by copyright. Copyright infringement is a violation of the rights 
of a copyright holder, when material whose use is restricted by copyright is 
used without consent. Plagiarism, in contrast, is concerned with the unearned 
increment to the plagiarizing author's reputation, or the obtaining of academic 
credit, that is achieved through false claims of authorship. Thus, plagiarism 
is considered a moral offense against the plagiarist's audience (for example, a 
reader, listener, or teacher).

Plagiarism is also considered a moral offense against anyone who has provided 
the plagiarist with a benefit in exchange for what is specifically supposed to 
be original content (for example, the plagiarist's publisher, employer, or 
teacher). In such cases, acts of plagiarism may sometimes also form part of a 
claim for breach of the plagiarist's contract, or, if done knowingly, for a 
civil wrong.

In academia and journalism
Edit

Within academia, plagiarism by students, professors, or researchers is 
considered academic dishonesty or academic fraud, and offenders are subject to 
academic censure, up to and including expulsion. Some institutions use 
plagiarism detection software to uncover potential plagiarism and to deter 
students from plagiarizing. However, plagiarism detection software does not 
always yield accurate results and there are loopholes in these systems.[31] 
Some universities address the issue of academic integrity by providing students 
with thorough orientations, required writing courses, and clearly articulated 
honor codes.[32] Indeed, there is a virtually uniform understanding among 
college students that plagiarism is wrong.[32] Nevertheless, each year students 
are brought before their institutions' disciplinary boards on charges that they 
have misused sources in their schoolwork.[32] However, the practice of 
plagiarizing by use of sufficient word substitutions to elude detection 
software, known as rogeting, has rapidly evolved as students and unethical 
academics seek to stay ahead of detection software.[33]

An extreme form of plagiarism, known as "contract cheating", involves students 
paying someone else, such as an essay mill, to do their work for them.[28]

In journalism, plagiarism is considered a breach of journalistic ethics, and 
reporters caught plagiarizing typically face disciplinary measures ranging from 
suspension to termination of employment.[34] Some individuals caught 
plagiarizing in academic or journalistic contexts claim that they plagiarized 
unintentionally, by failing to include quotations or give the appropriate 
citation. While plagiarism in scholarship and journalism has a centuries-old 
history, the development of the Internet, where articles appear as electronic 
text, has made the physical act of copying the work of others much easier.[35]

Predicated upon an expected level of learning and comprehension having been 
achieved, all associated academic accreditation becomes seriously undermined if 
plagiarism is allowed to become the norm within academic submissions.[36]

For professors and researchers, plagiarism is punished by sanctions ranging 
from suspension to termination, along with the loss of credibility and 
perceived integrity.[37][38] Charges of plagiarism against students and 
professors are typically heard by internal disciplinary committees, by which 
students and professors have agreed to be bound.[39] Plagiarism is a common 
reason for academic research papers to be retracted.[40]

Scholars of plagiarism include Rebecca Moore Howard,[41][42][43][44] Susan 
Blum,[45][46] Tracey Bretag,[47][48][49] and Sarah Elaine Eaton.[3][50][51]

Academia
Edit

One form of academic plagiarism involves appropriating a published article and 
modifying it slightly to avoid suspicion.
No universally adopted definition of academic plagiarism exists.[3] However, 
this section provides several definitions to exemplify the most common 
characteristics of academic plagiarism. It has been called, "The use of ideas, 
concepts, words, or structures without appropriately acknowledging the source 
to benefit in a setting where originality is expected."[52]

This is an abridged version of Teddi Fishman's definition of plagiarism, which 
proposed five elements characteristic of plagiarism.[53] According to Fishman, 
plagiarism occurs when someone:

Uses words, ideas, or work products
Attributable to another identifiable person or source
Without attributing the work to the source from which it was obtained
In a situation in which there is a legitimate expectation of original authorship
In order to obtain some benefit, credit, or gain which need not be monetary[53]
Furthermore, plagiarism is defined differently among institutions of higher 
learning and universities:

Stanford defines plagiarism as the "use, without giving reasonable and 
appropriate credit to or acknowledging the author or source, of another 
person's original work, whether such work is made up of code, formulas, ideas, 
language, research, strategies, writing or other form".[54]
Yale views plagiarism as the "... use of another's work, words, or ideas 
without attribution", which includes "... using a source's language without 
quoting, using information from a source without attribution, and paraphrasing 
a source in a form that stays too close to the original".[55]
Princeton describes plagiarism as the "deliberate" use of "someone else's 
language, ideas, or other original (not common-knowledge) material without 
acknowledging its source".[56]
Oxford College of Emory University characterizes plagiarism as the use of "a 
writer's ideas or phraseology without giving due credit".[57]
Brown defines plagiarism as "... appropriating another person's ideas or words 
(spoken or written) without attributing those word or ideas to their true 
source".[58]
The U.S. Naval Academy defines plagiarism as "the use of the words, 
information, insights, or ideas of another without crediting that person 
through proper citation".[59]
Forms of academic plagiarism
Edit
Different classifications of academic plagiarism forms have been proposed. Many 
classifications follow a behavioral approach, i.e., they seek to classify the 
actions undertaken by plagiarists.

For example, a 2015 survey of teachers and professors by Turnitin,[60] 
identified 10 main forms of plagiarism that students commit:

Submitting someone's work as their own.
Taking passages from their own previous work without adding citations 
(self-plagiarism).
Re-writing someone's work without properly citing sources.
Using quotations but not citing the source.
Interweaving various sources together in the work without citing.
Citing some, but not all, passages that should be cited.
Melding together cited and uncited sections of the piece.
Providing proper citations, but failing to change the structure and wording of 
the borrowed ideas enough (close paraphrasing).
Inaccurately citing a source.
Relying too heavily on other people's work, failing to bring original thought 
into the text.
A 2019 systematic literature review on academic plagiarism detection[61] 
deductively derived a technically oriented typology of academic plagiarism from 
the linguistic model of language consisting of lexis, syntax, and semantics 
extended by a fourth layer to capture the plagiarism of ideas and structures. 
The typology categorizes plagiarism forms according to the layer of the model 
they affect:

Characters-preserving plagiarism
Verbatim copying without proper citation
Syntax-preserving plagiarism
Synonym substitution
Technical disguise (e.g. using identically looking glyphs from another alphabet)
Semantics-preserving plagiarism
Translation
Paraphrase
Idea-preserving plagiarism
Appropriation of ideas or concepts
Reusing text structure
Ghostwriting
Collusion (typically among students)
Contract cheating
Sanctions for student plagiarism
Edit
In the academic world, plagiarism by students is usually considered a very 
serious offense that can result in punishments such as a failing grade on the 
particular assignment, the entire course, or even being expelled from the 
institution.[4] The seriousness with which academic institutions address 
student plagiarism may be tempered by a recognition that students may not fully 
understand what plagiarism is. A 2015 study showed that students who were new 
to university study did not have a good understanding of even the basic 
requirements of how to attribute sources in written academic work, yet students 
were very confident that they understood what referencing and plagiarism 
are.[62] The same students also had a lenient view of how plagiarism should be 
penalised.

For cases of repeated plagiarism, or for cases in which a student commits 
severe plagiarism (e.g., purchasing an assignment), suspension or expulsion may 
occur. There has been historic concern about inconsistencies in penalties 
administered for university student plagiarism, and a plagiarism tariff was 
devised in 2008 for UK higher education institutions in an attempt to encourage 
some standardization of approaches.[63]

However, to impose sanctions, plagiarism needs to be detected. Strategies 
faculty members use to detect plagiarism include carefully reading students 
work and making note of inconsistencies in student writing, citation errors and 
providing plagiarism prevention education to students.[64] It has been found 
that a significant share of (university) teachers do not use detection methods 
such as using text-matching software.[65] A few more try to detect plagiarism 
by reading term-papers specifically for plagiarism, while the latter method 
might be not very effective in detecting plagiarism – especially when 
plagiarism from unfamiliar sources needs to be detected.[65] There are 
checklists of tactics to prevent student plagiarism.[66]

Plagiarism education
Edit
Given the serious consequences that plagiarism has for students, there has been 
a call for a greater emphasis on learning in order to help students avoid 
committing plagiarism.[67][68][69] This is especially important when students 
move to a new institution that may have a different view of the concept when 
compared with the view previously developed by the student.[67] Indeed, given 
the seriousness of plagiarism accusations for a student's future, the pedagogy 
of plagiarism education may need to be considered ahead of the pedagogy of the 
discipline being studied.[67] The need for plagiarism education extends to 
academic staff, who may not completely understand what is expected of their 
students or the consequences of misconduct.[70][64][71] Actions to reduce 
plagiarism include coordinating teaching activities to decrease student load; 
reducing memorization, increasing individual practical activities; and 
promoting positive reinforcement over punishment.[72][73][74]

Factors influencing students' decisions to plagiarize
Edit
Several studies investigated factors that influence the decision to plagiarize. 
For example, a panel study with students from German universities found that 
academic procrastination predicts the frequency plagiarism conducted within six 
months followed the measurement of academic procrastination.[75] It has been 
argued that by plagiarizing, students cope with the negative consequences that 
result from academic procrastination such as poor grades. Another study found 
that plagiarism is more frequent if students perceive plagiarism as beneficial 
and if they have the opportunity to plagiarize.[76] When students had expected 
higher sanctions and when they had internalized social norms that define 
plagiarism as very objectionable, plagiarism was less likely to occur. Another 
study found that students resorted to plagiarism in order to cope with heavy 
workloads imposed by teachers. On the other hand, in that study, some teachers 
also thought that plagiarism is a consequence of their own failure to propose 
creative tasks and activities.[72]

Journalism
Edit
Since journalism relies on the public trust, a reporter's failure to honestly 
acknowledge their sources undercuts a newspaper or television news show's 
integrity and undermines its credibility. Journalists accused of plagiarism are 
often suspended from their reporting tasks while the charges are being 
investigated by the news organization.[77]

Self-plagiarism
Edit
See also: Duplicate publication
Learn more
It has been suggested that this section be split out into another article 
titled Self-plagiarism. (Discuss)
The reuse of significant, identical, or nearly identical portions of one's own 
work without acknowledging that one is doing so or citing the original work is 
sometimes described as "self-plagiarism"; the term "recycling fraud" has also 
been used to describe this practice.[78] Articles of this nature are often 
referred to as duplicate or multiple publication. In addition there can be a 
copyright issue if copyright of the prior work has been transferred to another 
entity. Self-plagiarism is considered a serious ethical issue in settings where 
someone asserts that a publication consists of new material, such as in 
publishing or factual documentation.[79] It does not apply to public-interest 
texts, such as social, professional, and cultural opinions usually published in 
newspapers and magazines.[80]

In academic fields, self-plagiarism occurs when an author reuses portions of 
their own published and copyrighted work in subsequent publications, but 
without attributing the previous publication.[81][82] Identifying 
self-plagiarism is often difficult because limited reuse of material is 
accepted both legally (as fair use) and ethically.[83] Many people mostly, but 
not limited to critics of copyright and "intellectual property" do not believe 
it is possible to plagiarize oneself.[84] Critics of the concepts of plagiarism 
and copyright may use the idea of self-plagiarism as a reductio ad absurdum 
argument.

Contested definition
Edit
Miguel Roig has written at length about the topic of 
self-plagiarism[82][85][86][87] and his definition of self-plagiarism as using 
previously disseminated work is widely accepted among scholars of the topic. 
However, the term "self-plagiarism" has been challenged as being 
self-contradictory, an oxymoron,[88] and on other grounds.[89]

For example, Stephanie J. Bird[90] argues that self-plagiarism is a misnomer, 
since by definition plagiarism concerns the use of others' material. Bird 
identifies the ethical issues of "self-plagiarism" as those of "dual or 
redundant publication". She also notes that in an educational context, 
"self-plagiarism" refers to the case of a student who resubmits "the same essay 
for credit in two different courses." As David B. Resnik clarifies, 
"Self-plagiarism involves dishonesty but not intellectual theft."[91]

According to Patrick M. Scanlon,[92] "self-plagiarism" is a term with some 
specialized currency. Most prominently, it is used in discussions of research 
and publishing integrity in biomedicine, where heavy publish-or-perish demands 
have led to a rash of duplicate and "salami-slicing" publication, the reporting 
of a single study's results in "least publishable units" within multiple 
articles (Blancett, Flanagin, & Young, 1995; Jefferson, 1998; Kassirer & 
Angell, 1995; Lowe, 2003; McCarthy, 1993; Schein & Paladugu, 2001; Wheeler, 
1989). Roig (2002) offers a useful classification system including four types 
of self-plagiarism: duplicate publication of an article in more than one 
journal; partitioning of one study into multiple publications, often called 
salami-slicing; text recycling; and copyright infringement.

Codes of ethics
Edit
Some academic journals have codes of ethics that specifically refer to 
self-plagiarism. For example, the Journal of International Business 
Studies.[93] Some professional organizations such as the Association for 
Computing Machinery (ACM) have created policies that deal specifically with 
self-plagiarism.[94] Other organizations do not make specific reference to 
self-plagiarism such as the American Political Science Association (APSA). The 
organization published a code of ethics that describes plagiarism as 
"...deliberate appropriation of the works of others represented as one's own." 
It does not make any reference to self-plagiarism. It does say that when a 
thesis or dissertation is published "in whole or in part", the author is "not 
ordinarily under an ethical obligation to acknowledge its origins."[95] The 
American Society for Public Administration (ASPA) also published a code of 
ethics that says its members are committed to: "Ensure that others receive 
credit for their work and contributions," but it makes no reference to 
self-plagiarism.[96]

Factors that justify reuse
Edit
Pamela Samuelson, in 1994, identified several factors she says excuse reuse of 
one's previously published work, that make it not self-plagiarism.[83] She 
relates each of these factors specifically to the ethical issue of 
self-plagiarism, as distinct from the legal issue of fair use of copyright, 
which she deals with separately. Among other factors that may excuse reuse of 
previously published material Samuelson lists the following:

The previous work must be restated to lay the groundwork for a new contribution 
in the second work.
Portions of the previous work must be repeated to deal with new evidence or 
arguments.
The audience for each work is so different that publishing the same work in 
different places is necessary to get the message out.
The author thinks they said it so well the first time that it makes no sense to 
say it differently a second time.
Samuelson states she has relied on the "different audience" rationale when 
attempting to bridge interdisciplinary communities. She refers to writing for 
different legal and technical communities, saying: "there are often paragraphs 
or sequences of paragraphs that can be bodily lifted from one article to the 
other. And, in truth, I lift them." She refers to her own practice of 
converting "a technical article into a law review article with relatively few 
changes—adding footnotes and one substantive section" for a different 
audience.[83]

Samuelson describes misrepresentation as the basis of self-plagiarism.[83] She 
also states "Although it seems not to have been raised in any of the 
self-plagiarism cases, copyrights law's fair use defense would likely provide a 
shield against many potential publisher claims of copyright infringement 
against authors who reused portions of their previous works."[83]

Organizational publications
Edit
Plagiarism is presumably not an issue when organizations issue collective 
unsigned works since they do not assign credit for originality to particular 
people. For example, the American Historical Association's "Statement on 
Standards of Professional Conduct" (2005) regarding textbooks and reference 
books states that, since textbooks and encyclopedias are summaries of other 
scholars' work, they are not bound by the same exacting standards of 
attribution as original research and may be allowed a greater "extent of 
dependence" on other works.[97] However, even such a book does not make use of 
words, phrases, or paragraphs from another text or follow too closely the other 
text's arrangement and organization, and the authors of such texts are also 
expected to "acknowledge the sources of recent or distinctive findings and 
interpretations, those not yet a part of the common understanding of the 
profession."[97]

Reply via email to