On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, David Honig wrote:
> Just because you're German doesn't mean you can say 'tight glands'
> without a snicker. 'Highly conductive gaskets' is perhaps less likely
Um, how do you know I wrote it without a snicker? ;)
Actually, I was referring to cable ducts which can act as a waveguide.
Of course, a fiber is rather thin, and it can be wrapped with adhesive
copper strips, so that it wouldn't be just a hole.
> to amuse the more adolescent among us.
>
> Testing is key. If you don't measure, you don't know.
Renting time in HF testing facilities is expensive. Do you have
suggestions for a simple sniffer type of instrument, that detects the
amplitude of a radiated field? Do FETs pick up HF fine?
I intend to build me a wearable based on a LART type of board
http://www.lart.tudelft.nl/
which will also house the crypto setup. Tempest proofing the rig will be
definitely part of the considerations. I see most problems with the
twiddler and the hud.
-- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204/">leitl</a>
______________________________________________________________
ICBMTO : N48 10'07'' E011 33'53'' http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204
57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3